The results of the regression analysis showed that according to its beta weights, variables contributing significantly to adolsents’ perceptions of their relations with father were educational level of fathers, elementary school education only, F =.56, p >.452, high school education only, F = 1.19, p >.303, university degree only, F =3.15, p < .025 and conflict resolutions behaviors, F=3.15, p<.025. Stepwise regression analysis was completed in four steps for perceived fathers-adolescents relations. At the end of first three step, fathers' education level accounted for 3 % of the total variance. One way analysis of variance indicated that there was significant differences in perceived fathers-adolescents relations according to the level of fathers education (F = 2,87 p<.023). A posthoc Tukey test was carried out to compare the average of education groups. Mean difference was significant only between adolesents whose fathers' were elementary and high school graduation. Adolesents having fathers' with elementary school graduation perceived more positively their relation with fathers than those with high school graduation (p<.05).When conflict resolution was entered into the equation in Step 4, explained variance of CRS increased from 3 % to 5 %, F = 4.25, p< .002. The educational levels of father accounted for 5 % of the total variance 95 % of the variance was not explained in this analysis.
The brand new seeking recommend that the greater number of useful philosophy from the relationships, men and women have, likely to be he has got dispute resolution habits
In this analysis, it was investigated new part away from dysfunctional matchmaking values towards one another brand new perceptions of their dating to the moms and dads and you may disagreement quality routines of your own later puberty. Morever, unreasonable relationhip opinions significantly discussed novel difference of character into the predicting one’s argument resolution behaviors. Such results are in line with earlier in the day look conclusions emphazing the value regarding individuals’ dysfunctional opinions incompatible solution behaviors (Haferkamp, 1994; Metts Cupach, 1990; Sillars, 1980; Timofiev, 1993)
It dating ranging from impaired relationships values and you can dispute solution habits are large level from inside the Interpersonal Rejection Subscale of ICDS. While the viewpoints about social getting rejected is the greatest predictor regarding dispute resolution practices, they informed me tall ratio to have variance away from argument solution decisions. Such subscales include thinking negative attributions of the individuals people’ practices and you will characteristics such as “people don’t discover me personally, people do not take on myself once i are in the a social ecosystem,” “I’m rejected if i let you know my thoughts and feelings to people around myself,” “People don’t continue their guarantees”.